Once the team received input PDF drawings, it defined the scope of work and initiated developing manufacturing drawings.
Enclosure with Tank
Pier Railing for Park
Initial calls were set up to clear off queries related to tooling capabilities and other RFIs in input drawings
Sometimes the team would also receive SolidWorks and other CAD models to correct the design details like dimensions and other features
Both, corrections and new drawing development were done after primary training by the design head at the client’s end to get acquainted with their drawing styles
Based on our previous experience with DFMA guidelines we began with sheet metal modeling in SolidWorks
Part drawings, assemblies, manufacturing drawings, BOMs were also created alongside
Team developed 3D parametric models with a top-down approach for repetitive products. This enabled the interlinking of parts and assembles to auto-update properties and design parameters
All work was allocated to assigned team members on a priority basis to ensure meeting delivery timelines
A work log was maintained to address the concern of remarks while multiple engineers worked on the same work order
The team gradually built the library of all product mixes for the client after three man-months, about 70% of the product library is readily available
Once the final sheet metal fabrication drawings with parts and assemblies were ready, they were QC-ed against the checklist and shared with the client through secure email
Additionally, in case of logo drawing 2D AutoCAD files were also generated and shared with the client
Business Impact
Hundreds of sheet metal building products designed as per DFMA guidelines
Top-down approach reduced customization errors and overall manufacturing cost
Library building helped bring down TAT from 25 hours to 14 hours for racks fabrication drawings